🏈The Trend We’re Watching: Stability
This deep into the season teams start to hone in on their identities, for better or for worse. Bill Belichick always said around Thanksgiving is where he had a sense of who his team was. We are seeing that in our own betting behavior with a 64% hit rate, 6.7 unit profit, and a 31.25% ROI. Let’s see if there will be any more surprises.

Buccaneers vs. Rams

The Rams’ SBx (points per minute) versus Tampa Bay’s SPBx (points allowed per minute) profiles to a steady, mid-20s outcome for LAR. The Rams’ scoring celeration has generally held positive week-over-week (upward trend) with a manageable bounce envelope, which points to repeatable red-zone trips rather than one-off spikes. Tampa Bay’s SPBx is tighter than their raw points-allowed suggests—drives tend to bend but not break—so the data leans toward more sustained Rams possessions that cash into a mix of touchdowns and field goals rather than a fireworks show.

Flip it around and Tampa Bay’s SBx against the Rams’ SPBx lands in the low-20s band. LAR’s defense shows a modest positive celeration (improving prevention) but still gives up structured, methodical drives when opponents stay on schedule. The Bucs’ scoring behavior is more “chunky” (bigger plays clustered), so when they’re on schedule they get into the low-20s; when they aren’t, the floor drops fast. That variability shows up in the bounce envelope—good enough to pop a couple of explosive series, but not consistent enough to project them into the mid-20s without help.

On time of possession, the Rams’ Ball Possession Behavior (BPB) versus the Bucs’ Ball Possession Prevention Behavior (BPPB) tilts slightly LAR: they sustain more first downs and keep their operant rate above the league median. Tampa Bay’s BPB versus the Rams’ BPPB looks closer to even but with more volatility—if the Bucs hit early explosives, they can level the possession split; if not, LAR’s steady rate pulls the game toward Rams control. Net effect: a neutral to slight Rams edge in possession minutes, which reinforces a 26–22 type game script.

Put together: the matchup leans Rams by a field goal to a touchdown. The Rams’ steadier SBx and possession control nudge them ahead, while the Bucs’ scoring volatility keeps them live for late cover scenarios. Expect the Rams to string together more sustained scoring opportunities, the Bucs to answer in bursts, and special teams (field goals) to matter.

Betting Guide

Our projection: Rams 26, Buccaneers 22 (Total 48).
Edge thresholds: spread ≥ 1.5 pts, total ≥ 2.0 pts.

• Moneyline: PASS — Rams -360 is too juiced for a ~4-pt model edge; Bucs +280 not aligned with a dog win projection.

• Spread: TAKE — Buccaneers +7 (-107). Model Rams -4 vs market -7 → ~3 points of cushion for the dog.

• Total 49.5: PASS. Model 48 (edge -1.5) doesn’t meet our ≥2.0 threshold.

Team Totals & FG props

• Bucs TT Over 19.5 (-148): PASS / Lean Over. Model 22 gives +2.5 pts of headroom but the price is heavy; fine as a parlay leg, otherwise pass.

• Rams TT Under 28.5 (-109): TAKE. Model 26 is 2.5 below the line; aligns with TB’s bend-don’t-break SPBx.

• Bucs FGs Over 1.5 (+106): PASS (small lean Over). Game script suggests 1–2 Bucs FGs; plus money is tempting but variance is high with their red-zone volatility.

• Rams FGs Over 1.5 (+122): TAKE. Rams sustain drives; TB’s SPBx profile increases “3s over 7s” in a handful of series. Plus money sweetens it.

• Game FGs Over 3.5 (-106): TAKE (small edge). Combined script supports 4+ attempts: Rams’ steadiness + Bucs’ bend profiles into multiple field-goal sequences.

Summary card:

• ✅ Bucs +7 (-107)

• ✅ Rams TT Under 28.5 (-109)

• ✅ Rams FGs Over 1.5 (+122)

• ✅ Game FGs Over 3.5 (-106)

• ◻️ Bucs TT Over 19.5 (-148) — price-sensitive leg only

• ◻️ Total 49.5 — pass

• ◻️ Rams ML -360 — pass

Panthers vs. 49ers

San Francisco’s SBx (points per minute) versus Carolina’s SPBx (points allowed per minute) points to a controlled, mid-20s output for the 49ers. Their scoring celeration has been positive enough to keep drives on schedule, and the seventh-column bounce rates in your sheets place their offense in the “predictable-to-moderately-predictable” band, which typically means fewer empty possessions and a steadier stream of scoring opportunities. Carolina’s SPBx prevents explosive runs but still yields sustained series when opponents stack first downs—consistent with a 24-point outcome rather than a blow-up.

On the other side, Carolina’s SBx matches up better than it looks on paper against the 49ers’ SPBx. The Panthers’ scoring is more streak-based (higher bounce on offense than S.F.’s defense), but their celeration trend has not cratered, and their median drive quality has crept into a range that supports ~22 points when they avoid self-inflicted stalls. The 49ers’ prevention is strong, but their bounce range allows a few red-zone intrusions if Carolina strings together two or three scheduled series in each half.

Time of possession tilts narrowly toward San Francisco on average. The 49ers’ Ball Possession Behavior (BPB) versus Carolina’s Ball Possession Prevention (BPPB) suggests slightly longer, more efficient drives that end in points or short-field flips. Carolina’s BPB versus the 49ers’ BPPB is more volatile—enough to produce a couple of longer possessions, but not enough total control to flip the overall possession edge. That mix points to field goals carrying real weight in the final margin.

Put it together and you get a close, possession-driven game that favors San Francisco by a field goal: 49ers 24, Panthers 22. The 49ers’ steadier SBx profile and small possession edge nudge them in front; the Panthers’ higher offensive bounce keeps live-dog scenarios on the table, particularly if they cash early red-zone trips into sevens.

Betting Guide

Our projection: SF 24, CAR 22 (Total 46).
Edge rules: spread ≥ 1.5 pts; total ≥ 2.0 pts; ML requires strong edge and fair price.

• Moneyline: PASS — 49ers -380 too juiced for ~2-pt model edge; not enough win probability for Panthers +290.

• Spread: TAKE — Panthers +7 (-108). Model has SF by ~2; that’s ~5 points of cushion versus the market.

• Total 49.5: TAKE — UNDER. Projection 46 → edge ~3.5 points to the under; aligns with possession-heavy script.

Team Totals & FG props

• Panthers TT 20.5 O/U (-108/-122): PASS / small lean OVER 20.5 (-108). Model 22 is +1.5 above the number but we prefer ≥2.0 points of cushion; price is fair if you want a light stake.

• 49ers TT 28.5 O/U (-108/-122): TAKE — UNDER 28.5 (-122). Model 24 sits 4.5 below; Panthers’ SPBx profile plus SF’s deliberate tempo support sub-29.

• Panthers FGs 1.5 O/U (+106/-141): LEAN OVER 1.5 (+106). Red-zone friction + game script put 2 Panthers attempts in play; take only at plus-money.

• 49ers FGs 1.5 O/U (+230/-325): PASS. At our projection, SF lands around 1–2 makes, but pricing is skewed; not enough value at these odds.

• Game FGs 3.5 O/U (+100/-127): TAKE — OVER 3.5 (+100). Both profiles point to multiple red-zone stalls; even money is attractive for 4+ combined.

Quick card:

• ✅ Panthers +7 (-108)

• ✅ Under 49.5

• ✅ 49ers TT Under 28.5 (-122)

• ✅ Game FGs Over 3.5 (+100)

• ◻️ Panthers TT Over 20.5 (small, price-sensitive)

• ◻️ Panthers FGs Over 1.5 (+106) (sprinkle only)

• ◻️ Moneyline (both) — pass

November 2025 Pigeon Picks Stats

Become a paying subscriber of Pigeon Picks+ to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

A subscription gets you:

• • Game-Changing NFL Betting: Insights Backed by Behavior Science For EVERY Game
• • Exclusive Content
• • Proprietary Analytics and Rankings
• • So Much More!